Gregory Scott Moss
  • Home
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Links
  • About Me
  • Teaching Philosophy
  • Special Training and Teaching Related Experiences
  • Course Evaluations
  • Description of Courses Taught
  • Sample Teaching Materials
  • Sample of Student Work
  • Sample Syllabus
  • Innovative Teaching Projects: Socratic Encounters

Sample Syllabus

Phil 3000: Classics of Ancient Western Philosophy            
Instructor: Gregory Moss
Office Hours, T 2-3pm, Peabody 1                                               
Through Session 2011, 1:00-2:00pm MTWTHF, Peabody 205S                       
Email: greg@uga.edu
                       
Description and Objective:

Phil 3000 is an introduction to Ancient Greek philosophy focusing particularly on works of Plato and Aristotle. Prerequisite: PHIL 1000 or PHIL 2200 or PHIL 2400 or permission of department. This course will specifically focus on problems in Ancient Greek Metaphysics and Epistemology. 

Required Texts*:

1) Barnes, Jonathan, Early Greek Philosophy, Penguin Books, 2001
2) Plato, Parmenides, Trans. Albert Keith Whitaker, Focus Philosophical Library, 1996
3) Aristotle, Metaphysics, Trans. Joe Sachs, Green Lion Press, 2002

*ATTENTION: Acquire these books immediately!

Tentative Grading Percentages:            

                        Argument Critique, Plato                     20% (100pts), Due June 27th

                        Mid Term (cumulative)                        20% (100pts), July 1st

                        Argument Critique, Aristotle               30% (150pts), Due July 18th

                        Final Exam (cumulative)                      30% (150pts)

TOTAL POINTS: 500

Grade Scale:

A:   93-100%

A-:  90-92%

B+: 87-89%

B:   83-86%

B-:  80-82%

C+: 77-79%

C:  73-76%

C-: 70-72%

D:  60-69%

F: < 60%

Grade Criteria:

A:

The student knows the authors positions, and proves this knowledge by knowing the argument(s) supporting the theses in the text. Student evidences self-initiated thinking and understanding of the arguments through his/her ability to present her own counter-arguments and possible replies to counter-arguments. The student exhibits thorough understanding of the relations of the themes presented in the various texts.


B:

The student knows the authors positions, and generally understands the arguments supporting them. Student has difficulty developing her own criticisms and rebuttals to criticism. The student exhibits relatively complete understanding of the relations of the themes presented in the various texts.

C:

The student shows the ability to properly relay information about the text and the positions contained therein, but has difficulty re-constructing the arguments, presenting counter-arguments, and criticism. Student has a difficulty understanding arguments. The student shows an incomplete understanding of the relations of the themes presented in the various texts.

D:

The student cannot explicate the positions or the arguments for such positions in the text. The student exhibits seriously incomplete understanding.

F:

The student exhibits all the failures mentioned under ‘D’. The student earns an F by having a blatant disregard for the great masters of the western tradition by not reading and not attending lectures.

Participation:

Two unexcused absences are permitted. For each unexcused absence beyond two, one-half a letter grade will be deducted from your final grade. In case of emergencies, either notify me of your absence ahead of time, or plan to bring some formal documentation of your absence. Without documentation, I will not accept absences as excused. All technology, including laptops and cell phones, must be turned off during our meeting hours. If you are caught texting, reading ‘texts’, or violate this technology policy in any way, I reserve the right to count you as absent.

Assignments:

Read and study each assignment before class meetings. You are responsible not only for all written assignments, but also for having completed each reading assignment. Helpful contributions to class discussions requires close readings of the text before we discuss them.

Consider the following schedule tentative.

June

10 Introduction

13 Heraclitus, Early Greek Philosphy

14 Heraclitus, Early Greek Philosophy

15 Parmenides, Early Greek Philosophy

16 Zeno, Early Greek Philosophy

17 Plato, Parmenides

20 Plato, Parmenides

21 Plato, Parmenides

22 Plato, Parmenides

23 Plato, Parmenides

24 Plato, Parmenides

27 Plato, Parmenides

28 Plato, Parmenides

29 Plato, Parmenides

30 Plato, Parmenides

July

1 Plato, Parmenides

5 Midterm Exam

6 Aristotle, Metaphysics

7 Aristotle, Metaphysics

8 Aristotle, Metaphysics

11 Aristotle, Metaphysics

12 Aristotle, Metaphysics

13 Aristotle, Metaphysics

14 Aristotle, Metaphysics

15 Aristotle, Metaphysics

18 Aristotle, Metaphysics

19 Aristotle, Metaphysics

20 Aristotle, Metaphysics

21 Aristotle, Metaphysics

22 Aristotle, Metaphysics

25 Aristotle, Metaphysics

26 Aristotle, Metaphysics

27 Aristotle, Metaphysics

28 Aristotle, Metaphysics

29 Aristotle, Metaphysics Paper II Due

August

1 Aristotle, Metaphysics

2 Aristotle, Metaphysics

3 Review

 FINAL EXAM: August 5 3:30-6:30

Exams:

Exams will contain two sections. One section will consist of short answer questions, in which you will be asked to provide arguments for particular conclusions elicited from the texts. You will not be asked to provide arguments for any conclusions except those which are discussed in class. The second section will consist of long-essay questions in which you will re-construct the position and the arguments of a philosopher(s) on a particular theme, e.g. ‘Being’. You will also be asked to critique these arguments and relate them to other philosophers and texts which we have discussed.

Essays:
              
Essays consist of three parts. In respect to the papers, I shall provide you with passages from the texts which we are reading, and I will ask you to choose one passage to work on. You will formulate the argument contained in that passage, and formulate a critique of that passage. The last stage consists in formulating a reply to the criticism that you raise. I encourage you to utilize the texts that we are reading in formulating your criticisms.

Administrative Policies:

Late Work/Make-Ups: Late papers will be penalized one-half a letter grade for each day the paper is tardy. I will only give a make up, exam if the absence is approved in advance or you provide evidence that an emergency prevented you from attending class. I will always be willing to discuss your grade with you. If you would like a grade changed, you must provide me with a detailed written argument for why you think it should be changed, otherwise I will not consider it.

Resources:

If you have a disability requiring special accommodations, contact the Disability Resource Center @ (http://www.drc.uga.edu). For general academic counseling, see (www.uga.edu/dae). To better inform yourself about UGA's policies concerning academic honesty visit the following website:

(http://www.uga.edu/ovpi/honesty/culture_honesty.htm). It is your responsibility to be familiar with these policies. 

Create a free website with Weebly